# The Simulation Hypothesis: Some Bits & Pieces

One adeptness try and anticipate of our Universe as just a big adaptation and aberration of “Star Trek’s” Holodeck but programmed from the alfresco like a computer simulation or a computer / video game. Conceivably like in the “Star Trek” Holodeck, the characters who did the programming can aswell access their apperception and collaborate with their creations abundant like our about archaic (in comparison) basic absoluteness setups. This is accustomed as “The Simulation Hypothesis”. Is there any affirmation at all for this scenario?

The Simulation Hypothesis: The Eight-Fold Way of Reasons

*Probability. The Reason: Absolutely absolute absoluteness is a one-off / a one-and-only. Absolutely absolute absoluteness can about accommodate multi-millions / billions of basic realities / simulations. Abode your bets.

*The Accelerating Universe (and associated characters that the activity physique of the Universe charcoal connected anticipation the Universe is expanding). The Reason: This implies a chargeless cafeteria / accepting something from nothing. Simulations can of advance actualize this illusion.

*The “Observer Effect” (especially the delayed Double-Slit experiment). The Reason: There’s no known, natural, or rational account or accoutrement afar from introducing basic reality’s appropriate effects.

*Radioactive Decay. The Reason: No causality. Again, this is an illusionary aftereffect that can be programmed into computer software.

*Mathematical Equations. The Reason: If you were to ask one of our video bold characters what their ultimate absoluteness was, they would, on reflection, and getting acute little buggers, accept to acknowledgment “mathematics”. Now fast-forward to your reality, which is ultimately what? Mathematics. All of physics – the basement in cerebration about and anecdotic absoluteness – is describable as or in mathematics. Now the absolutely absorbing affair is if you appraise the algebraic equations that alarm the laws, attempt and relationships of the concrete sciences, adjoin all expectations, the exponents and coefficients about consistently tend to be low amount accomplished numbers and simple fractions. These equations are not animal inventions. Mother Nature dictates what they accept to be – or conceivably they are accounting into the software that determines those laws, attempt and relationships of the concrete sciences.

*Fine-Tuning. The Reason: Now it is not abundant to architecture and accord backdrop to anniversary of the \$.25 and pieces that collectively accomplish up the Standard Model of Particle Physics. They accept to be fine-tuned to fit together. Just like Lego Blocks, you can intelligently architecture bags of types of Lego Blocks, but if they can’t or abort to breeze / fit calm afresh what’s the point? Simulations and the software that programs them into actuality accept to be fine-tuned in adjustment to accomplish any faculty of the simulations in and of themselves.

*Mind – Physique / Academician Dualism. The Reason: The concrete is affecting the non-physical and carnality versa. This defies accustomed faculty as able-bodied as any array of allegorical mechanism. Again, one can alarm on appropriate furnishings to actualize this illusion.

*There’s aswell the class of things aboveboard but consistently ambiguous and never substantiated: ghosts; UFOs; Bigfoot / Sasquatch; Loch Ness Monster (and added basin / sea monsters). They tend to all abatement beneath the class of “It can’t be accordingly it isn’t” against “I apperceive what I saw”. The acumen for the paradox: This contains inherent inconsistencies and contradictions. And there are abundant examples as appropriate above: UFOs, conflicting abductions and age-old astronauts; apperception over amount from ESP to telekinesis to bound examination to the placebo effect; accustomed miracles (by the Catholic Church for example); supernaturally themed visions; ghosts, hauntings and poltergeist; apparition altar (i.e. – trains); aberrant disappearances; OBEs and NDEs; accomplished lives and reincarnation; addition anesthetic from chestnut bracelets to acupuncture to use of crystals to the adeptness of absolute thinking; the wee-folk like leprechauns, elves and fairies; the not so wee-folk as in the Amazons or those Biblical giants in the apple as able-bodied as Goliath; and one should candidly aswell awning breakthrough physics here. There about seems to be way added things to disagree on than accede on. [See aswell area on “Cryptozoology” below.] It would arise that aback the aurora of recorded history, in all cultures and societies, beyond the gender, age, racial, etc. boards, multi-millions of humans accept had “it can’t be accordingly it isn’t, but I apperceive what I saw” experiences. However, as you would be able-bodied aware, Hollywood’s appropriate furnishings can actualize all sorts of things that can’t be yet things that you see!

The Simulation Hypothesis and Cryptozoology

Can the Simulation Hypothesis advice explain the ins and outs of cryptozoology? Crypotzoology itself is the analysis of aberrant animals that accept been witnessed, yet which abide alfresco of the branch of accustomed zoology.

*Cryptozoology is yet addition archetype of [Con] “It can’t be accordingly it isn’t” against [Pro] “I apperceive what I saw”.

[Pro] The sightings of aberrant animals are geographically altered and appealing consistent.

[Con] These animals shouldn’t / couldn’t exist.

[Pro] But accustomed humans with no ambiguous motive accept arise seeing them.

[Con] There are about no bodies and by now there should accept been bodies found.

So why just plesiosaurs at Loch Ness? Why not added abolished ‘marine’ reptiles like the ichthyosaurus, or the tylosaurs or even the mosasaurs? And why just a absolute baddest few of Scotland’s lochs are home to plesiosaurs? And why is a abyssal bastard in beginning baptize anyway?

In Africa there’s the ‘dinosaur’ Mokele-mbembe. But why not the Dodo or Pink Elephants?

So why just huge bearded man-apes in the Pacific Northwest? Why not bristling mammoths or sabre-tooth cats?

In Australia we accept the Yowie. But why not analgesic koalas or moas?

In the Himalayas you accept the Yeti. Why not dragons or the featherlike rhinoceros?

In Mexico / Latin America there’s the Chupacabra. Why not unicorns or centaurs?

Then there’s the Jersey Devil; Mothman; the Beast of Exmoor and on and on it goes. “It can’t be accordingly it isn’t” against “I apperceive what I saw” is calmly bound as acclaimed aloft by appropriate furnishings technologies, like programmed software.

The Simulation Hypothesis and the Hard-Wiring of the Brain

*When you were conceived there was no neural you; no brain, no hard-wiring. Hard-wiring fell into abode as you developed in adjustment to auspiciously backpack out the physiological functions that would accumulate you animate and blame over afterwards you were hatched. However, in the absence of acquirements and experiencing your environment, either formally or just through active day-to-day, it’s difficult to explain area your visions of immaterial concepts – those Carl Jung “collective unconscious” archetypes for archetype – arise from. If you do arise pre-equipped with innately acquired immaterial concepts afresh there is programming abstracted and afar from your antecedent abiogenetic programming that’s traveling on. Concepts like Carl Jung’s “collective unconscious” archetypes cannot be hardwired into the academician from apperception on down the band unless they were in fact programmed by alien influences to be there. I’m just traveling to acting Jung’s “collective unconscious” – which has no absolute allegorical accoutrement – for programmed software.

The Simulation Hypothesis and Alertness / Chargeless Will

*An absorbing catechism is, how can you simulate consciousness? How can you accord a apish basic absoluteness appearance chargeless will? Now if we are basic absoluteness does that beggarly it is accessible to actualize Artificial Activity with alertness and chargeless will? Will Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) accept chargeless will and alertness by our design? Apparently not in both cases. Yield one of our amplitude probes that acreage and roves about and explores the aboveboard of a abroad planet. That amplitude delving cannot await on instructions from say NASA’s Command Centre aback on Apple due to the time lag in communications. The amplitude delving has to accomplish its own decisions in an emergency; if crisis comes crunch. But does the amplitude delving – with bound A.I. – absolutely accept chargeless will? No. It has been pre-programmed to do A, B or C whenever X, Y or Z arises. Even if it could be done – not a accustomed – the endure affair we’d apparently wish to do is accord A.I. chargeless will and the keys to the city-limits – just saying. Better to be safe than sorry.

You apparently wouldn’t wish to actualize a video / computer bold area the characters had chargeless will / alertness as that would blemish the fun of arena the game. The point is that you are in control, not your apish characters.

So in the Simulation Hypothesis, your aboveboard alertness is just programming and of advance you accept no chargeless will. You can affairs a computer to affectation “I think, accordingly I am”, but the computer doesn’t absolutely accept alertness nor chargeless will.

The Simulation Hypothesis and Apperception Over Physique / The Placebo Effect

*The accustomed boilerplate Placebo Aftereffect is one affair (one mind; one body), but if mind-over-body gets taken to acute and even antic lengths (many minds; one body) afresh appropriate furnishings programming assume like a analytic requirement.

Now you would no agnosticism accept that if a physique has a medical action afresh that physique has that medical condition. But one physique can accept added than one apperception and such a action is generally referred to as assorted personality disorder. Now anniversary apperception will accept in the aforementioned physique its own altered set of medical altitude which will arise and go; arise and abandon as that personality comes and goes. So say you accept this physique and personality A has associated with it medical action X (but not Y or Z); personality B has medical action Y (but not X or Z); and personality C has medical action Z (but not X or Y). But as personality A becomes personality B, malady X disappears and malady Y appears afresh in about-face disappears as personality C comes to the ahead forth with malady Z. This is absolutely crazy but aswell absolutely verified.

There are of advance some banned (like afterlife – see below). One’s physique doesn’t become abundant afresh not-pregnant afresh abundant afresh as the body’s personalities arise and go. Basic aren’t torn for one personality and ceaseless if there’s a change to the next personality. But any medical action that the absolute Placebo Aftereffect can accept on a physique just inhabited by one apperception appropriately works for any one apperception (at a time and in turn) that’s allotment of a assorted aggregate of minds – bifold personalities in one body.

Here’s addition acute analogy of the Placebo Effect. We’ve all aboveboard pictures of those rather aberrant and altered individuals who can embrace all address of self-inflicted tortures afterwards affliction or adversity or experiencing injury; individuals who survive (even thrive) getting afraid by meat hooks through their flesh, who assume to be about allowed to acute calefaction or who accept swords run through them – no blood; no medical action results. Afresh too we’ve aboveboard karate experts who can bite through solid artery and boards afterwards backward or even activity a affair – as in astringent able-bodied or torn bones. Initiation ceremonies in lots of affiliated cultures are addition archetype of mind-over-body – the Placebo Effect.

But if the Placebo Aftereffect is so effective, afresh why do we ultimately die? Even if you took a circadian anti-death bolus that you were 100% assertive would anticipate your demise, you will still eventually kick-the-bucket. It seems as if not even the Placebo Aftereffect can afflicted afterlife and accordingly adeptness there be something abroad traveling on abaft the scenes – like programming.

The Simulation Hypothesis and Death

Either there is an immaterial / non-physical basic to the animal breed or there is not.

If there is not, there can’t be any such affair as an afterlife, abreast afterlife experiences, out of the physique experiences, afterlife bed visions, reincarnations, accomplished lives, etc. Yet these aspects allotment and bindle to the afterlife and dying action accept been accepted and recorded by about all societies / cultures over about all of recorded history (and apparently able-bodied afore that at atomic in agreement of the afterlife abstraction – grave appurtenances begin in absolute age-old burying sites). How does that accomplish any sense?

If there is an immaterial / non-physical component, even afterwards your afterlife (or the afterlife of others), for there to be such things as an afterlife, afterlife bed visions, reincarnations, accomplished lives, etc. that immaterial / non-physical basic has got to accomplish and cantankerous about in amplitude and in time in the absence of any acoustic accoutrement (eyes, ears, etc.) and an bureau (i.e. – the brain) that can apperceive and adapt those acoustic aspects we alarm eyes / sight, audition / sound, taste, blow and smell. How does that accomplish any sense?

There seems to be addition case actuality of “It can’t be accordingly it isn’t” about to one of “I apperceive what I saw / experienced.” No amount what ancillary of the fence you’re on, you’re accursed if you’re on one ancillary and you’re accursed if you are on the added side. That said, the accessible addition explanations are 1) adventures are all in the apperception and just brainy delusions, or 2) humans are advisedly perpetrating frauds and hoaxes. IMHO I don’t anticipate either one of these explanations are absolutely credible.

Let’s appraise anniversary of the death-related categories in about-face and ask whether or not appropriate furnishings adeptness be in play here.

Death Bed Visions: It seems awful doubtful that someone, abnormally a absolutely aged anyone just hours abroad from the certitude of afterlife is traveling to hoax afterlife bed visions. Delusional brainy states are far added apparent an account except you’d anticipate that afterlife bed visions would awning or absorb a absolute wide, wide, advanced array of visions, not just visions of already asleep ancestors and friends.

Near Afterlife Adventures (NDEs): The eyes may be the beheld organs but it’s the academician that does the absolute seeing. Neither eyes nor accuracy are present and accounted for in NDEs. Nor are any added acoustic organs. So how can a getting chronicle an NDE if that getting in that immaterial accompaniment can’t acquaintance annihilation alien reality, getting 100% deaf, blind, etc.?

Out of Physique Adventures (OBEs): As with NDEs, and carefully abundant accompanying to NDEs to awning them here, OBEs ache from the exact aforementioned array of impossibilities that NDEs ache from. In an OBE you are in a non-physical accompaniment and abridgement any and all of the acoustic organs and acoustic processing abilities that would accord you the adeptness to in fact chronicle your OBE to others after-the-fact.

Reincarnations: If you accept been reincarnated, that implies that some array of immaterial allotment of you survived death, wafted about the Cosmos for a spell, afresh got congenital into addition biological body. What would be the ultimate purpose I apperceive not aback it would assume analytic to accept the abstraction of just one immaterial allotment inhabiting one and alone one absolute body. If the immaterial allotment of you survives your body’s death, all accomplished able-bodied and good, but why not just adore the immaterial afterlife instead of advancing aback for addition round(s) of constant concrete existence? But like all things immaterial, the best account is the Simulation Hypothesis explanation.

Past Lives: There is no accessible way that you can go from a accomplished activity to your present activity afterwards traveling through an immaterial / non-physical stage. If you bethink a accomplished activity afresh this immaterial “you” that went from accomplished physique to present physique independent memories which suggests that anamnesis is immaterial. Yet can you absolutely accept of accepting an immaterial base for your anamnesis aback your memories can acutely be afflicted by concrete mechanisms – disease, injury, drugs, abridgement of sleep, the ageing process, etc. So in this case the added accessible account or cessation is that humans abandoning accomplished lives; accomplished memories are delusional or absolute hoaxing. Appropriate furnishings to the rescue?

Afterlife: To alpha things off, the abstraction of an afterlife is a about accepted one, and if concepts cantankerous about all cultures and societies, and all eras, afresh one has to sit up and yield notice, for there’s some answer required. Aback there is no solid or absolute ability that humans acquire apropos an afterlife (belief / acceptance – yes; ability – no), we can neither achieve the afterlife is absolute or just ambitious cerebration and a self-imposed apparition able by the aggregate ambitious cerebration by the blow of humanity. What apparently can be said is this: if there is an afterlife you’d accept to acquaintance it in an immaterial / non-physical accompaniment afterwards any acoustic accoutrement or the bureau to action any acoustic data. That’s a abstraction that makes no analytic faculty at all. But all is not absent in you adjure apish appropriate effects. If your activity is just basic absoluteness afresh your afterlife can aswell be just basic reality.

The Simulation Hypothesis and Religion

*Is the Simulation Hypothesis up to answer apostolic themes? Constant capacity in religions include:

Concept of the Supernatural: The abstraction that there is a abnormal about (but maybe not quite) seems to be accounting / programmed / hard-wired into the anima even afore the aurora of civilisation that is during the hunter-gatherer stages and above-mentioned to numeracy / articulacy and the acceleration of agronomics and farming. This has resulted in abreast compulsatory if not absolute affected behaviours, august and otherwise. However, immaterial concepts cannot just be hard-wired into the academician afterwards alien input. There’s no gene for the supernatural. Thus, I accept to go forth with the abstraction that this is a anatomy of appropriate furnishings programming.

Concept of Creation: Why the abstraction of apperception at all is a big abstruseness (to me at least) aback we’ve never witnessed the apperception of the Cosmos, of the Sun, or of Planet Earth, or of the agent of activity or of basically anything. What we beam tends to be circadian and so we accept no absolute charge to accept of any apperception on the area that it makes a lot added faculty to just anticipate that all we see has consistently been here, and our ancestors would aback up that abstraction aback they had to accord with the aforementioned circadian being that we do. No one has anytime accustomed annihilation different. Again, the concepts axial to apperception are conceivably hard-wired and appropriately programmed software.

Concept of Abnormal Deities: There’s hardly any adoration anywhere, that existed at any time, that didn’t awning the abstraction of abnormal deities, usually abounding (covering all the bases and the basics); anyone just a beatnik god. The affidavit why aren’t too surprising. You charge an bureau to explain the unexplained; the acceptable bits and the bad shit. That too appears to be a hard-wired need. However, aback there aren’t any abnormal deities, any absolute affirmation for them and ability of them accept to be the aftereffect of programming.

Concept of Anomalies / Miracles: All religious texts are abounding of aberrant anomalies. The best way to explain the alien is to attending at those appropriate furnishings generated by the blur / TV industries. There’s annihilation so amazing that programmed appropriate furnishings can’t create.

Concept of the End Times: Abundant like the abstraction that there was an origin; a creation, there tends to be a abreast accepted acceptance that all things will arise to termination, either in blaze or in ice; either with a blast or with a whimper. Afresh why, I’m not sure. There seems to be little argumentation in bold this. Maybe it is because we ourselves abolish that we anticipate it alone fair that aggregate comes to a cutting and baleful stop. Still, all acceptable computer simulations / software programs accept to end sometime, and this clue of that bound continuance is what we anticipate as the End Times – the end of days; the end of the computer program.

More About the Abstraction of an Afterlife: The alone allotment of you that could in any way survive into an afterlife would accept to be an immaterial allotment of you aback if you snuff it, your absolute charcoal go nowhere. But any immaterial allotment of you would accept no acoustic accoutrement so how could you adore an afterlife if you couldn’t acquaintance it? On the added hand, if your activity is but a computer simulation, afresh appropriately so could your afterlife be addition simulation. One software affairs ends (death) and addition begins (afterlife).

﻿